fbpx Skip to main content

For men with advanced prostate cancer, the oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist relugolix maintains testosterone suppression compared with the GnRH agonist leuprolide, while enzalutamide is associated with improved survival versus placebo in nonmetastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer, according to two studies published online May 29 in the New England Journal of Medicine to coincide with the American Society of Clinical Oncology Virtual Scientific Program.

Neal D. Shore, M.D., from the Carolina Urologic Research Center in Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, and colleagues randomly assigned patients with advanced prostate cancer to receive relugolix (orally once daily) or leuprolide (injections every three months) for 48 weeks (622 and 308 patients, respectively). The researchers found that 96.7 and 88.8 percent of men receiving relugolix or leuprolide, respectively, maintained castration (sustained testosterone suppression to castrate levels) through 48 weeks. The difference indicated noninferiority and superiority of relugolix. The superiority of relugolix over leuprolide was also demonstrated in all other key secondary end points.

Cora N. Sternberg, M.D., from Weill Cornell Medicine in New York City, and colleagues conducted a double-blind study in which men with nonmetastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer and a rapidly rising prostate-specific antigen level who were receiving androgen-deprivation therapy were randomly assigned to receive enzalutamide or placebo (933 and 468 patients, respectively). The researchers found that median overall survival was 67 and 56.3 months in the enzalutamide and placebo groups, respectively (hazard ratio for death, 0.73).

“These results add to the growing body of evidence that androgen-receptor inhibitors not only delay the time to metastasis but also improve overall survival among men with nonmetastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer,” the authors write.

The Shore study was funded by Myovant Sciences; the Sternberg study was funded by Pfizer and Astellas Pharma.

You May Also Like::  Assessing Patient-Reported Barriers to Sickle Cell Disease Treatment

Abstract/Full Text – Shore (subscription or payment may be required)
Abstract/Full Text – Sternberg (subscription or payment may be required)
Editorial (subscription or payment may be required)
More Information

“Keeping up with the indications and adverse reactions to immune checkpoint inhibitors can be a full-time job. Cutaneous side effects occur in up to 45% of patients treated with ipilimumab and 34% of patients treated with nivolumab and pembrolizumab.” https://bit.ly/3FGtxtd

.@spfnomt: This month’s #DermWorld article “Estate planning 101” is especially important for young physicians to read. The long, all-consuming years between adolescence and physicianhood can become a blur...https://bit.ly/3FxOtCv

That’s a wrap #AAD2023! 5 days of soaking up knowledge from dermatologists on topics such as hidradenitis, melasma, & dietary triggers of common dermatoses.

I LOVED the #womenshealth focused sessions on vulvar dermatoses and pregnancy medication safety.


New approach uses microbiome to treat skin disease by repairing the injured microbiome that allowed inflammation to flare up in the first place, rather than reducing the inflammation after the fact. https://bit.ly/3Jt6H9v

Load More