fbpx Skip to main content

HER2-positive breast cancer provides many distinct therapeutic challenges, and these can be simplified through a comprehensive understanding of the molecular subtypes characterizing different forms of heterogeneity that this cancer may exhibit. As heterogeneity is one of the leading sources of difficulty in treating HER2-positive breast cancer, understanding molecular subtyping can help create more informed novel therapeutic pathways.

In an article published in Frontiers in Oncology on October 29, 2019, a team of researchers summarizes advancements in the understanding of HER2-positive breast cancer as well as the HER2-enriched subtype, with specific attention paid to explaining the intrinsic heterogeneity of HER2-positive cancer.

It is noted that the most common subtype of HER2-positive breast cancer is HER2-enriched. The HER2-enriched subtype responds positively to anti-HER2 therapies but is also commonly found as a subtype of HER2-negative cancers. However, anti-HER2 therapies are not currently approved for treating HER2-negative cancers. The suggestion is made that reclassifying the HER2-enriched subtype could provide more appropriate therapeutic strategies on the basis of genetic and molecular biomarkers that are distinct from HER2 amplification.

The authors provide a detailed discussion of the current breast cancer classifications, and testing methods to identify HER2-positive biomarkers. This includes a discussion of histopathological subtyping, gene-expression testing, and the role of HER2 amplification in therapeutic strategizing.

The authors conclude that HER2 amplification is unsatisfactory as a biomarker used to determine which anti-HER2 therapies should be used for a given patient. This is directly related to heterogeneity in HER2-positive cancers. The authors note that “The HER2+ BC do not represent a subtype itself, but are instead dispersed along the whole breast cancer spectrum, from hormone receptor-positive luminal to hormone receptor-negative basal phenotype, with genome variations accordingly to these phenotypes and incidentally defined by a specific gene amplification.” This idea, in conjunction with the specific results discussed in detail throughout the article, leads to the conclusion that the HER2-enriched subtype is the most appropriate biomarker for prognosticating the efficacy of anti-HER2 medications.

You May Also Like::  Biological and Clinical Implications of HER2 Breast Cancer

Source: Deciphering HER2 Breast Cancer Disease: Biological and Clinical Implications

“Keeping up with the indications and adverse reactions to immune checkpoint inhibitors can be a full-time job. Cutaneous side effects occur in up to 45% of patients treated with ipilimumab and 34% of patients treated with nivolumab and pembrolizumab.” https://bit.ly/3FGtxtd

.@spfnomt: This month’s #DermWorld article “Estate planning 101” is especially important for young physicians to read. The long, all-consuming years between adolescence and physicianhood can become a blur...https://bit.ly/3FxOtCv

That’s a wrap #AAD2023! 5 days of soaking up knowledge from dermatologists on topics such as hidradenitis, melasma, & dietary triggers of common dermatoses.

I LOVED the #womenshealth focused sessions on vulvar dermatoses and pregnancy medication safety.


New approach uses microbiome to treat skin disease by repairing the injured microbiome that allowed inflammation to flare up in the first place, rather than reducing the inflammation after the fact. https://bit.ly/3Jt6H9v

Load More