The spatial distribution of CD103+CD8+ tissue-resident memory T cells is a prognostic biomarker for non-small cell lung cancer, according to the results of a recent cohort study.

Tissue-resident memory T cells (TRM) are a special population of immune cells that reside in solid[spacer height=”10px”]tumors and their microenvironment. Although emerging evidence has linked these cells to[spacer height=”20px”]better response to immunotherapy, their role is controversial, as the functional and spatial[spacer height=”20px”]heterogeneity of TRM subsets remains unknown.

A study in the Journal of Translational Medicine determined the spatial localization of CD103+CD8+[spacer height=”20px”]TRM subsets through multiplex immunofluorescence in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.

Study Population

A total of 274 patients with stage IA–IIIB NSCLC were enrolled, among whom 108 relapsed during[spacer height=”20px”]follow-up. The median follow-up period was 65.9 months. Most patients were male (65%), with stage[spacer height=”20px”]I disease (55.3%) and lung adenocarcinoma (65.3%).

CD103+CD8+ TRM cells Exhibited Better Infiltration and Stronger Interaction With Cancer Cells

TRM cells (CD103+CD8+ cells) accounted for more than half of the CD103+ cells in the tumor center[spacer height=”10px” id=”3″](TC) and the invasive margin (IM). TRM cells predominated cytotoxic T cells (CD8+ cells) in TC, and vice[spacer height=”10px” id=”3″]versa in the IM. Compared to Tnon-RM (CD8+CD103cells), TRM cells exhibited a higher infiltration score[spacer height=”10px” id=”3″]in TC, shorter mean nearest neighboring distance to cancer cells in TC and IM, and higher cancer cell[spacer height=”20px”]proximity score in the IM (all P<0.001), suggesting better infiltration and stronger interaction with[spacer height=”20px”]cancer cells of TRM.

Diverse CD103+CD8+ TRM Cells Correlated With Immune Checkpoints

You May Also Like::  Improving Cancer Screening Messaging for African Americans

CD103+CD8+ cells demonstrated a significant positive correlation with immune checkpoint[spacer height=”20px”]expression, i.e., PD-1+CD8+, Tim-3+CD8+, and with GZMB+CD8+ cells. Four TRM subgroups were[spacer height=”10px” id=”3″]defined based on immune checkpoint expression patterns: TRM1 (PD-1Tim-3TRM1), TRM2 (PD-1+Tim-3[spacer height=”10px” id=”3″]TRM), TRM3 (PD-1Tim-3+TRM), and TRM4 (PD-1+Tim-3+TRM). The IM exhibited more TRM1 and less TRM4 [spacer height=”10px” id=”3″]than TC. The infiltration scores of  TRM1 and TRM2 were significantly lower than those of TRM3 and TRM4.[spacer height=”10px” id=”3″] The mean nearest neighboring distance to cancer cells progressively decreased, and the cancer-cell[spacer height=”20px”]proximity score progressively increased from TRM1 to TRM4.

TRM Cell Subsets May Act as a Prognostic Biomarker for NSCLC Patients

For a comprehensive assessment of TRM, TRM-based spatial immune signature (TRM-SIS) was[spacer height=”20px”]constructed by integrating multiple machine learning methods. The effectiveness of TRM-SIS was[spacer height=”20px”]evaluated and validated through time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curve analyses.[spacer height=”20px”]The area under the curve values for 1-, 3-, and 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) were as follows:[spacer height=”20px”]0.823, 0.794, and 0.742, respectively, in the training set, 0.687, 0.691, and 0.690, respectively, in the[spacer height=”20px”]testing set, and 0.776, 0.730, and 0.693, respectively, in the entire cohort.

The TRM-SIS system demonstrated better predictive capability than the TNM staging system. In[spacer height=”20px”]survival analyses, patients with high TRM-SIS had a worse prognosis than those with low TRM-SIS[spacer height=”20px”](mDFS: 33.07 months vs. not reached in the training set (P<0.001), 67.97 months vs. not reached in[spacer height=”20px”]the testing set (P=0.048), and 58.93 months vs. not reached in the entire cohort (P<0.001),[spacer height=”20px”]respectively). The TRM-SIS emerged as an independent prognostic factor for DFS (hazard ratio=2.43,[spacer height=”20px”]95% confidence interval: 1.63–3.60, P<0.001).

You May Also Like::  Western Diet May Have Detrimental Effect on Prostate Cancer Risk

Tumor Angiogenesis Was Found to Be Unfavorable to TRM Cells

Gene set enrichment analysis showed that tumor angiogenesis impeded TRM. Cancer microvessels[spacer height=”20px”](CMVs) were negatively correlated with TRM density, infiltration score, and cancer cell proximity score[spacer height=”20px”]and positively correlated with the mean nearest neighboring distance from TRM cells to cancer cells.[spacer height=”20px”]The high TRM-SIS group showed a significantly higher CMV density in the IM than the low TRM-SIS[spacer height=”20px”]group. High CMV density was associated with a poor NSCLC prognosis.

Source:

Yang, G., Cai, S., Hu, M., Li, C., Yang, L., Zhang, W., Sun, J., Sun, F., Xing, L., & Sun, X. (2024). Spatial features of specific CD103+CD8+ tissue-resident memory T cell subsets define the prognosis in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Journal of Translational Medicine, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-023-04839-4 

 

Categories